Mary Kassian on the Royal Wedding

From Mary Kassian:

Last week, over 2 billion viewers—about a third of the world’s population—watched the Royal Wedding. As is common in marriage ceremonies, the Officiate opened with:

“Dearly Beloved; we are gathered here in the sight of God and in the face of this congregation to join together this man and this woman in holy matrimony—which is an honorable estate, instituted by God Himself, signifying to us the mystical union that is betwixt Christ and His Church . . .”

I wonder how many observers caught the depth of meaning in those opening words. That one sentence contains some profound, staggering truths about marriage and the meaning of manhood and womanhood and sex.

The traditional opening to the marriage ceremony acknowledges that marriage isn’t a man-made institution. It was instituted by God Himself. He’s the author of marriage, and therefore, He alone defines what marriage is all about.

Read the rest here.

Piper Interviews Warren on Doctrine

From Desiring God and John Piper:

This 98 minute interview that I did with Rick Warren was recorded on May 1, 2011, during the Desiring God Regional Conference at Saddleback Church. It’s the fulfillment of a commitment we made when Rick was not able to come in person to the Desiring God National Conference in Minneapolis in October, 2010.

The nature of the interview is mainly doctrinal. I read Rick’s The Purpose Driven Life with great care. I brought 20 pages of quotes and questions to the interview. You will hear me quote the book dozens of times. With these quotes as a starting point I dig into Rick’s mind and heart on all the issues listed below (with the times that they begin on the video).

My aim in this interview is to bring out and clarify what Rick Warren believes about these biblical doctrines. In doing this my hope is that the thousands of pastors and lay people who look to Rick for inspiration and wisdom will see the profound place that doctrine has in his mind and heart.

Rick is not known for being a doctrinal preacher. One reason for this is his intention to be theologically sound and practically helpful without using doctrinal or theological terms in his public ministry. Inside of Saddleback there is a greater intentionality about building biblical and theological categories into the people’s minds and hearts.

Near the end of the interview, with great respect and appreciation for the stewardship of influence that Rick carries, I exhort him and pray for him that God will make the final chapter of his ministry a deepening one, that leaves a legacy of biblical and doctrinal truth more explicitly and firmly in the minds and hearts of the generations that will follow him.

Rick and I are very different in methodological instincts and inclinations. I take almost the exact opposite approach in preaching—wanting to make the theological categories explicit and to show how I got them from the text. But then I am not even close to the fruitful evangelist that Rick is.

We both have chosen risky ways. There are pitfalls of short- and long-term unfruitfulness. But in the end we do not govern the impact of our lives. God does. We do what the Bible and our hearts call us to do. I believe Rick’s is a faithful heart. Listen to the clarity of his doctrinal commitments and hear the heartbeat of his love for Christ and those perishing without him.

Let this remarkable testimony of faith send you down into the Word of God for a deeper understanding of God and his ways. Here are the topics we tackle and when they begin on the video.

Introduction
3:29  The glory of God.
7:16  David Wells and the weight of God’s reality.
9:00  Would you write the book the same today?
12:00 The sovereignty of God.
18:47 How do you speak of God’s sovereignty in the presence of tragedy?
22:01 How do all things work for bad for those who reject Christ?
24:14 Do you hedge on Larry King?
27:00 Unconditional election.
30:18 The importance of eternity.
34:42 How do you conceive of eternity: in heaven, on earth?
38:53 What is the Gospel?
42:00 What did Jesus achieve on the cross?
43:40 Repentance.
50:50 Why don’t you call yourself a Calvinist?
53:09 Propitiation.
54:39 Prevenient grace.
1:00:01 Total depravity.
1:03:00 Hell.
1:09:10 Eternal destiny of those who never heard.
1:12:40 The extent of the atonement.
1:17:00 Do unbelievers always do the devil’s bidding?
1:18:40 Your view of the Bible.
1:22:40 Expository preaching and doctrinal depth.
1:28:10 Rick Warren’s sacred trust.

 

Jesus Lives

Here is a new song from Sovereign Grace’s new album, Risen. I’ve bought the album myself and can definitely vouch for it. As usual, there songs are Christ-centered and weighty in lyrics. You can buy it here.

 

9 Myths About Sex and Relationships

From the Resurgence:

Social researchers Mark Regnerus and Jeremy Uecker expose nine myths about sex and relationships among emerging adults in America (ages 18–23) in their book, Premarital Sex: How Young Americans Meet, Mate, And Think About Marrying. What follows are their myths:

Myth: Long-term exclusivity is a fiction

  • Truth: Half of all marriages last a lifetime, and extramarital affairs are not as common as assumed.

Myth: The introduction of sex is necessary in order to sustain a fledgling or struggling relationship

  • Truth: The quicker sex enters a relationship, the sooner the relationships fails, and most relationships fail.

Myth: Boys will be boys. That is, men can’t be expected to abide by the sexual terms that women may wish to set. You may not want the double-standard to be there, but it’s there

  • Truth: Women may enjoy sex as much as men, but they do not think and feel the same way about it. Generally they “set higher standards for their relationships.”

Myth: It doesn’t matter what other people do sexually; you make your own decisions

  • Truth: The actions and attitudes of others do affect your decisions: “If a critical mass of men and women enjoy an extended series of sexual relationships and expect sex fairly promptly within them, it becomes quite difficult for a minority to do otherwise.”

Myth: Porn won’t affect your relationships

  • Truth: Because more and more men are viewing porn regularly it “cannot but shape sexual market dynamics.” And studies have shown that the tandem of porn and masturbation actually “reduces the value of intercourse” because it is much more physiologically satisfying than masturbation alone. “Porn becomes easier, and so must women (on average).”

Myth: Everyone else is having more sex than you are

  • Truth: You are less conservative than you think. “Most still overestimate how much sex is actually going on around them.” The authors write about this phenomena of pluralistic ignorance, “it happens when individuals within a group begin to believe that their own private attitudes, beliefs, or judgments are more conservative and rare than thepublic norms they see displayed by others.”

Myth: Sex need not mean anything

  • Truth: This myth can occur broadly between the sexes, but exists especially among women. It is emotionally challenging for women to engage in casual sex and to experience a broken sexual relationship.

Myth: Marriage can always wait

  • Truth: Most emerging adults still want to get married—eventually. They put off marriage for years and years and thus the marriage market “does not grow deeper and more impressive with age.” Thus, the authors encourage “men and women who’ve met someone who is ‘marriage material’ to think twice before rejecting the notion that they’re just not ready yet.”

Myth: Moving in together is definitely a step toward marriage

  • Truth: In most cases, cohabitation does not last. “It overwhelmingly leads to either marriage or breakup within a few short years.” It is also more advantageous to men than to women as it gives them “more stable access to sex, without the expectations or commitments of marital responsibilities.”

Carson: The Rich Man and Lazarus

From Kim Winters:

 

I Should Want to be Left Behind

Benjamin L. Merkle, “Who Will Be Left Behind? Rethinking the Meaning of Matthew 24:40-41 and Luke 17:34-35,” WTJ 72 (2010): 169-79.

Justin Taylor‘s take: Here’s his thesis, in essence: “Although many assume that those taken in Matt 24:40-41and Luke 17:34-35 are taken to be with Jesus and those left behind are left for judgment, this inter­pretation should be rejected.”

Merkle’s conclusion summarizes his arguments:

Throughout the context of these passages Jesus uses judgment language reminiscent of the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem and the subsequent exile of its inhabitants. Those who were taken away were the ones judged by God whereas those left behind were the remnant who received grace.

Furthermore, the teaching of Jesus confirms this thesis. In the Parable of the Weeds the Son of Man sends his angels to gather out the children of the devil and throw them in the fiery furnace whereas the wheat is left behind (Matt 13:36-43).

The context of Matt 24 and Luke 17 also suggests Jesus is intentionally using judgment and remnant language. Such language naturally brings up images of the former destruction of Jerusalem where the enemy came and “took away” (i.e., killed) those in the city.

Finally, the parallel with Noah and the flood in the preceding verses strongly confirms our thesis. Just as in the days of Noah the people were taken away by the great flood, so those who are not prepared will be taken away when the Son of Man returns.

You can read his arguments in more detail here.

 

I Am Second

If you listen to our local Christian radio station, the Word FM (88.1), you are probably familiar with the show they air in the mornings called Mornings with Brant.  I find Brant Hansen to be hilarious and insightful.  A friend of mine sent me this video in which Brant tells his story, which I just had to share.  Be encouraged by it as we think about how the Lord can use our own weaknesses for His glory.

 

 

Bosnia Missions Trip

From Tyler Miller:

Hey Friends,

I believe all of you know that we (Nate, Fred, Dick, Eric and myself) are heading out next week for our missions trip to Bosnia.  We leave next Wednesday, May 11.  Below is an itinerary of our trip.  I appreciate knowing that we have your prayer support as we go.

 

Trip Itinerary

Wednesday, May 11 – Leave Dulles Airport, 6:45 PM

Thursday, May 12 – Arrive in Zagreb, Croatia at 12:45 PM, Travel to Sanski Most with Pastor Beki

Friday, May 13 – Firm up plans and schedule with Beki, begin family visits.

Saturday, May 14 – Visiting and socializing, begin sports ministry.

Sunday, May 15 – Worshiping with the Sanski Most Evangelical Church.  Nate will be preaching on Philippians 1:1-11.

Monday, May 16 – Sports and Bible Seminar, Dick teaching on Phil 1:12 – 30 in Sanski Most.

Tuesday, May 17 – Sports and Bible Seminar, Nate & Eric teaching on Phil 2:1-30 in Prejidor.

Wednesday, May 18 – Sports & Bible Seminar, Fred & Dick teaching on Phil 3:1-4:1.

in Sanski Most.

Thursday, May 19 – Sports and Bible Seminar, Tyler teaching on Phil 4:2-23 in Prejidor.

Friday, May 20 – Travel to Breza with a several hour stop in Jajce with Dina and others in the church.

Saturday, May 21 – Tyler leaves from Sarajevo Airport at 7:30 AM.  The team will go to Zenica to visit Pastor Enver and church leaders.  A contact will be made with the Espinoza’s,  Costa Rican missionaries.

Sunday, May 22 – Worship with the Breza Evangelical Church.  Fred will preach on Phil 3-1-10.  Sunday PM may be spent in Sarajevo offering encouragement to believers and a time of fellowship.

Monday, May 23 – Nate leads a seminar for men on ‘Becoming Men of God.’  Visits include time at Door of Hope Drug Rehabilitation Center.

Tuesday, May 24 – Continuing fellowship with those in the Breza church.  Fred leads a time of prayer at the Breza church’s weekly prayer meeting.

Wednesday, May 25 – Team departs Sarajevo Airport at 7:30 AM and arrive in Dulles at 2:10 PM.

Osama bin Laden and the Value of Justice

From Kevin DeYoung:

There are really two questions to answer: 1) Did Osama bin Laden deserve to die? 2) Did those who killed him have authority to do so? I believe the answer to both those questions is yes. Consequently, his death was a matter of justice for which we can be grateful.

1. Did Osama bin Laden deserve to die? Genesis 9:6 suggests he did: “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image.” Capital punishment for murder is not an assault on the image of God, but a defense of it.  It is because human life is so precious, that the taking of human life needs to be punished so severely. The principle of “eye for eye, tooth for tooth, wound for wound” (Exod. 21:23-25) was not a matter cruel and unusual punishment, but of controlled retribution as a means of protecting the community and valuing the dignity of human life.

Read the rest here.

Upcoming Old Testament Study

Lord willing, we’ll be looking into some Old Testament history this May through summer in SixTen.   While doing some prep reading in 1 Chronicles I came across the frightening story of Uzzah in Chapter 13 (with a slightly more detailed account in 2 Samuel 6).   Therein fresh King David has decided to bring the Ark of the Covenant of the Lord (think “Raiders of the Lost Ark”) back to himself, to the people, and to Jerusalem -it had been taken previously by the Philistines before being sent halfway back to Israel, making it as far as the house of Abinadab.   But now David wants to bring it all the way home.
The occasion is marked by unity, festivity, and intensity: all of Israel is assembled, the music is loud and constant, and the people are expressing themselves ”with all their might.”   That’s when Uzzah, one of two men specially appointed to caretake the Ark, reaches out to stabilize it as the oxen stumble.   And the Lord’s anger burns against Uzzah such that the Lord immediately takes Uzzah’s life.
Really? What’s the big deal about that?   Isn’t God overreacting, especially to kill a man who was only trying to help?   David thought so.   In fact, David was so convinced God’s retaliation was so extreme that he got angry at God -seemingly having judged God for being hostile, temperamental, even immature.   Don’t we do this sometimes?   We have ways in our minds -presuppositions perhaps- as to how God should respond to us, particularly amidst our “praise” of Him.   If we go out of our way to get together and honor him, and do so with a fair degree of passion, then shouldn’t He soak it up and return the favor?
David’s anger (v11) did not last long (v12).   He had already begun to ask the question of “What went wrong?” even as he asked “How can I bring the ark of God to me?”   And by 1 Chronicles 15:13 David has the answer: “It was because you, the Levites, did not bring it up the first time that the Lord our God broke out in anger against us.   We did not inquire of Him how to do it in the prescribed way.”   Amazingly, despite his sincerity, David’s disobedience cost Uzzah his life.   (The oxen hardly stumbled by accident!)   The Levites were the ones God wanted to bring the Ark, and it wasn’t enough that they be identified, they had to be consecrated -”made holy” in a way Uzzah had not been when he quick stretched to touch.
There is at least one overarching lesson to learn here: it is impossible to celebrate God while ignoring God’s Word.   No matter how universal our agreement and energetic our praise, if we “worship” God on our terms rather than His terms, we fail.   However, we can succeed in bringing God glory, just like they did -such a joyful narrative through Chapters 15 & 16!   When the content of our worship is as self-sacrificial as God indicates (Romans 12:1-2) and Christ calls for (Matthew 5-7), we, with God, will win.